randystreasureadventures
Member
Guys, I’ve heard and been involved in a sort of debate, if you will, about what is worth the time when it comes to detecting for gold. I just want to hear opinions here, not really weighing towards one side or the other, although I realize we all want to find ‘THE BIG ONE’. SO-
Scenario 1-you’re hunting in gold bearing ground but finds have whittled down to tiny fly poop nuggets weighing in the tenths of a gram. But you may find 10-30 of these.
Scenario 2-skip that little sh**, I just want to run max sensitivity down the middle of the wash and I don’t care if I dig a few antique horseshoes, I want that lunker half-ouncer.
I see both sides here, but since I only get out a few times a year, I try the blended approach. I’ll crank the sensitivity on the 6000 and hit hillsides and small, steep washes for the first couple days, as well as search new areas myself or my buddies may not have hit. Two to three days in, after my knees start complaining, I’ll be ready to stay in a more gentle wash, dig some, and play the numbers game.
So do you care to work and dig fly poop, or just cover ground waiting for your headphones to blow off?
Scenario 1-you’re hunting in gold bearing ground but finds have whittled down to tiny fly poop nuggets weighing in the tenths of a gram. But you may find 10-30 of these.
Scenario 2-skip that little sh**, I just want to run max sensitivity down the middle of the wash and I don’t care if I dig a few antique horseshoes, I want that lunker half-ouncer.
I see both sides here, but since I only get out a few times a year, I try the blended approach. I’ll crank the sensitivity on the 6000 and hit hillsides and small, steep washes for the first couple days, as well as search new areas myself or my buddies may not have hit. Two to three days in, after my knees start complaining, I’ll be ready to stay in a more gentle wash, dig some, and play the numbers game.
So do you care to work and dig fly poop, or just cover ground waiting for your headphones to blow off?